Відео

God did nothing though, nothing outside of basic directions....nothing else.

Funny you claim his argument is a strawman but offer not valid evidence nor did you address any points, you just complained. You say: "All geological facts observed today is 100% proven scientific fact of the reality of the global flood, including the existence of the fossil record it created." Cool, then present the peer reviewed articles on said research, after all any valid scientists knows the importance of that. I expect you will share the numbers a peer reviewed paper comes with so we can all look them up. Given that if this comment as no reply with the research then we know you lied....which is typical for anyone defending the Bible.

The Bible has been proven to be the most accurate account of ancient history. Also, the reality of God creating everything is not a proven scientific fact. Knowing that God created us is not a religion but is a scientific reality. You cannot find all of the truth from a scientific journal that rejects all scientific evidence that is against their world view by the peer reviewers. Many scientists publish the truth of what I said in peer reviewed Creation science journals. You have been exposed to only the one side which is controlled by atheists. You cannot refute the facts that I show you but only ignore them. Using science I can prove to you that the ark easily held all of the kinds of animals that breathed.  High C14 existence worldwide including the fossil record every place that carbon is found limits age to much less than 100,000 years.  caves form in rocks while still existing as mud  clastic dikes - can form only when formations are unconsolidated  clastic pikes - same  coal fields - can form only when massive amounts of trees are quickly buried so they can heat up quickly to form coal rapidly  continental planation surfaces - on every continent  continental shelves - evenly all coasts with sharp drop-offs  deep canyons - had to be full at top level to leave buttes and pinnacles  erosional remnants - formed during dispersal phase or would not exist today  fossil record - had to be buried alive by massive sediments quickly  frozen trundra - ending of the 700 year glaciation period  ice age - only possible explanation requiring hot polar oceans during massive volcanism after the flood  lack of erosion - over 80% of sediments on continents, not in oceans  lack of enough salt in oceans  magnetic field decay - cannot increase & constant decay  mesa  mid-oceanic ridges - remnants of where fountains of the deep erupted  oversized rivers - 14 times volume at end of glaciation period  pancake layering - no time between formations  pediments  pinnacles  polystrate trees - buried through multiple layers  rounded quartzite rocks over distances - during dispersal phase of the flood  sediments bent up with mountains - all sediments laid down level flat before mountains rose  submarine canyons  water gaps & wind gaps - formed during dispersal phase while water was high  woolly mammoths - lived during the glaciation period in places warmed by (hot ocean) winds after the flood

@@danminer5343 <----Your name in blue. I notice you are too scared to respond to me given my name does not appear nor it is in blue. That itself shows you are scared or uncertain. You said ""All geological facts observed today is 100% proven scientific fact of the reality of the global flood" I asked you to provide the peer review and instead I get some lame excuse. This is why you are scared to address me then....you have NOTHING. You say "You cannot find all of the truth from a scientific journal that rejects all scientific evidence that is against their world view by the peer reviewers. ", that is wrong, if you understood how peer reviewed worked you'd know that it is a system designed to ensure not bias screws with it. You then claim I cannot refute the fact but I can and will, as your facts are just words....no valid studies to back them up.

@@ThyBountyHunter "Science" and "Nature" and some other scientific journals that are "peer reviewed" have a concrete rule that the peer reviewers must follow, and that ii must rejected all scientific information that is against what is already in dogma which included science that is against the story of "evolution" and the story of millions of years. They have made this clearly known for decades. This is why the highest qualified scientists publish the indisputable scientific facts showing that the Global flood was an actual event and showing the false assumptions inserted into every "dating method" which falsely show older ages. You do not realize that you are being duped/brainwashed. The evolutionists will do anything to convince to to not learn what the creation scientists have discovered. Evolutionism is extremely anti-science. No book or journal in the world has a chemical explanation as to how any protein, amino acids, sugars, carbohydrates, enzymes, lipids nucleotides, RNA or DNA could form from prebiotic elements. They have spent of government money hundreds of million dollars in million dollar labs and resulting in 100% failure with zero success.ll And you still believe their garbae?

*Garbage*